It has been a long time since the readers had a well-argumented analysis of theoretical aspects of foreign policy planning and relations of the past half a century. It is high time the foreign policy planning and relations of the past half a century. It is high time the foreign policy framers cast-off the blinkers of dogmatism and confrontation and describe from positions of the new thinking, the evolution of foreign policy concepts. The nations are formulating their foreign policy doctrines on the basis of their contacts with the outside world. The author's creative reasoning on some foreign policy issues shows that he has managed to break free from the cobweb of outdated dogmas.
Attempts by political leaders of any country to export their ideas and way of thinking to the outside world no doubt have deep roots in its history. The messianic all for a stepped up class struggle was seen in foreign policy doctrines of both the Soviet Union and China, "Forget the past, look to the future" is a description of Sino-Soviet relations which has become well known. But it is politicians rather than historians who can afford to say a thing like that. As a true historian, the author seeks to provide answers to many questions that have lost none of their topicality: What were Soviet foreign policy-makers miscalculations that contributed to the strategic rapprochement between Beijing and Washington in the 1970s? Why did China finally give up its cooperation with the West spearheaded against the USSR and decided to normalize Sino-Soviet relations in the 1980s?
Global changes are looking differently to different nations and group of nations: it cannot seem similar from Delhi, Moscow, Washington and Beijing. India has to make its own appraisal and identify the emerging realignment of forces as helpful or injurious to its national and international interests. This is the first task of foreign policy in contemporary eta; a deep, continuing appraisal of World forces at work and identification of changes that are conducive to India as well as forces that are actually or potentially hostile.
It is a book which must appeal to scholars from a background of knowledge of either foreign policy affairs-diplomacy or international relations, and would also be an interesting account for the diplomats. If there is a weakness, it is that the reader may at times become bogged down in a mass of detailed recollections, so that one may lose the thread of events. It is here that the detailed introduction given by the author is invaluable in setting the stage.
The present volume is a notable addition to our understanding of international relations and history of foreign policy planning.
This book confirms that the study of foreign policy is a rich source of tough academic questions, especially in the field of international affairs.

